Energy companies need stable long-term carbon market to make investments in carbon capture: panel

0
Energy companies need stable long-term carbon market to make investments in carbon capture: panel

Article content

Uncertainty, in both the short and long term, are holding back carbon capture projects from reaching final investment decisions, a panel of experts and industry said at a recent Calgary event.

Advertisement 2

Article content

“We have all the ingredients that 90 per cent of the rest of the world doesn’t have — why are we not advancing faster on this imperative?” said Peter Tertzakian, Calgary-based energy economist and founder of ARC Energy Research Institute on Tuesday, Oct. 1.

Though a number of carbon-capture projects have been finalized, including Shell Canada’s Polaris project located in northern Strathcona County, which will capture 650,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide annually, Canada’s carbon markets — the trading systems in which carbon credits are sold — remain in flux, argued members of the panel, speaking as part of a discussion organized by Conversations Live at Platform Calgary.

The key to settling that issue will be establishing what would be an incredibly costly yet effective floor on the price of carbon, called carbon contracts for difference. Calgary-based Entropy Inc. is the lone Canadian company that has reached such an agreement with the federal government, a $200-million deal announced last year that guaranteed the sale of up to 185,000 tonnes per year of carbon credits for the price of $86.50 a tonne over 15 years.

Advertisement 3

Article content

Since that announcement, however, there has been little news from the federal government on movement toward implementing a broader market. And the $15 billion set aside for the Canada Growth Fund, while significant, is not enough to pay for an entire market based around carbon contracts for difference, said Ian MacGregor, founder of Alberta’s Sturgeon Refinery located in Alberta’s Industrial Heartland and co-founder of North West Capital.

“The amount of money in the Canada Growth Fund . . . that’s not very much money in this world,” MacGregor said. “It gets soaked up in a couple projects.”

Alberta energy
Left to right, Justin Reimer (Emissions Reduction Alberta), Zach Parston (KPMG), Peter Tertzakian (ARC Energy Research), Deborah Yedlin (Calgary Chamber of Commerce), Claude Letourneau (Svante) and Ian McGregor (Sturgeon Refinery) joined host Stuart McNish from Conversations Live for a discussion at Platform Calgary on Oct. 1, 2024, about the potential and pitfalls of carbon capture in Canada. Courtesy Derek Hader/Conversations Live jpg, SP, apsmc

Creating an industry-wide framework mimicking the details of that agreement are needed to ensure investments in carbon capture are assured and not vulnerable to the whims of changing governments, said Deborah Yedlin, president and CEO of the Calgary Chamber of Commerce.

Advertisement 4

Article content

“There’s been a lot of discussion in recent months about the importance of carbon markets globally, and how we really need to harmonize the international carbon markets,” Yedlin said.

Tertzakian characterized carbon capture projects as a “waste disposal business.”

“We still have to crack this nut, frankly, of how to create the economic conditions to be able to stimulate the investment required to catalyze this waste disposal business,” he said. Tertzakian argued current policy around carbon markets are unclear and not harmonized, making them “dysfunctional.” This has made it increasingly difficult for industry to comfortably sign off on final investment decisions, he said.

MacGregor, meanwhile, said that if a floor on the price of carbon is determined, companies will need assurances from governments that it will endure elections and changes in government.

Advertisement 5

Article content

“I also think it has to be durable over multiple election cycles. It’s not just one cycle — these are 20- to 30-year projects. I don’t even know what the carbon tax is going to be over 30 years, not over four years,” MacGregor said.

Ultimately, Tertzakian argued, the majority of emissions from the oil and gas industry come from how those fossil fuels are used, both by industry and consumers.

“Net zero is also overwhelmingly not achievable until people who make decisions about burning fossil fuels change their attitude . . . the first order of business is to stop burning, because that’s the decision we make every day, and switch to a renewable source or maybe become more efficient.”

[email protected]
X: @mattscace67

Article content

link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *